To all peoples of the WORLD! Please be aware. AMERICA is about to Strike RUSSIA in a FAST strike to begin WW3. This is an OFFICIAL WARNING, it is no joke. ALL HUMANS must prepare. This is a MAJOR BULLETIN! ALL People on this Planet MUST cooperate together immediately or the end of this Earth will be upon us. There is to be only a small space of time. MANKIND MUST come together NOW. Stand together! Whatever Nation. America MUST reach out to Russians and all people. Wake up NOW!

High-Alert Nuclear Weapons and Launch-on-Warning Capability

Accidental Nuclear War Caused by Terrorism

Is it possible to have a reliable defense against a nuclear attack?

Can the population be protected in a nuclear attack?

The contents of this section have been copied and adapted (as well as supplemented) from the ISANW publication, “Facts About Nuclear Weapons”.

High-Alert Nuclear Weapons and Launch-on-Warning Capability

See “No Launch On Warning”

The U.S. and Russia keep hundreds of missiles armed with thousands of nuclear warheads on high-alert, ready to launch with only a few minutes warning.  High-alert status permits the launch a retaliatory nuclear strike before the arrival of a perceived nuclear attack.

• Early Warning Systems (EWS), high-alert nuclear-armed ballistic missiles, and nuclear command and control systems, all working togeth High-Alert Nuclear Weapons and Launch-on-Warning Capability
• Accidental Nuclear War Caused by Terrorism
• Is it possible to have a reliable defense against a nuclear attack?
• Can the population be protected in a nuclear attack?

The U.S. and Russia keep hundreds of missiles armed with thousands of nuclear warheads on high-alert, ready to launch with only a few minutes warning.  High-alert status permits the launch a retaliatory nuclear strike before the arrival of a perceived nuclear attack.

Early Warning Systems (EWS), high-alert nuclear-armed ballistic missiles, and nuclear command and control systems, all working together, provide the U.S. and Russia the capability to Launch-on-Warning.

When Early Warning Systems warn of an impending nuclear attack, then decisions have to be made very quickly because the flight times of the missiles are very short.  30 minutes or less are required for a nuclear-armed land-based Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) to travel between the U.S. and Russia and vice versa; 15 minutes or less for a Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) to reach its target.

Thus, once the attack is detected, evaluated and passed up the chain of command, the U.S. and Russian president would have at most 12 minutes to make the decision to launch a retaliatory nuclear strike before the arrival of the perceived attack.

In the event an attack is believed to be real, the president must decide whether or not to launch a retaliatory nuclear strike before the arrival of the perceived attack is confirmed by nuclear detonations.  To launch a retaliatory nuclear strike based only upon electronic information derived from Early Warning Systems is to Launch-on-Warning.  If the perceived warning turns out to be false but a retaliatory nuclear strike has already been launched, then accidental nuclear war will have occurred.

The US and Russia are the only two nations believed to have the capacity to carry out Launch-on-Warning (they both have nuclear C3I systems connected to their nuclear weapon systems which  enable them to carry out LoW).

Accidental Nuclear War Caused by Terrorism

Under Launch-on-Warning policy, a false warning due to human error, technical error or terrorist sabotage can result in accidental nuclear war.

Terrorists could carry out two forms of attacks which could cause a mistaken retaliatory launch using Launch-on-Warning policy.  First, terrorists could create the illusion of an impending nuclear attack.  They could do so by spoofing radar or satellite sensors of Early Warning Systems to imitate a nuclear attack.  This could also be accomplished by introducing computer viruses or software that mimic a full-scale nuclear attack into Early Warning System computers or computers which compromise the nuclear command and control systems.

Rather than create the illusion of an attack, terrorists could also gain access to high-alert nuclear weapons.  They could launch these weapons if they obtain launch codes and access to the command and control systems, or physical control of a weapon system

If the nuclear weapon states would eliminate the policy of Launch-on-Warning, accidental nuclear war based upon a false warning would be prevented .

Is it possible to have a reliable defense against a nuclear attack?

Nuclear weapons can arrive at their targets in all manner of ways.  Weapons do not have come via missiles or strategic bombers, they can be smuggled across borders and arrive in a commercial airliner, a ship or truck.  A bomb can be exploded in the harbor of a nation before it is even taken ashore.  Even the most vicious police state will be hard-pressed to prevent nuclear weapons from entering its territory.

However, since most nuclear weapons in the US and Russia are mounted on some form of missile, the focus for years has been how to defend against a missile attack. Despite decades of research and tens of billions of dollars of expenditures, it has proven virtually impossible to construct a defense system which can reliably detect and shoot down missiles which travel faster than a speeding bullet.

Simple defensive measures, such as employing decoys which resemble warheads, are enough to overwhelm and defeat even the latest versions of missile defense.  US missile defense systems also have extremely limited capabilities in terms of the numbers of missiles which they could engage (even if they had 100% assurance of destroying each target, which they do not).  A single failure of such a system would likely result in the deaths of millions of people

Deploying and expanding these systems has historically only added fuel to an arms race which causes the deployment of more opposing missiles and the development of new technologies designed to overcome any defensive measures.  Furthermore, missile defense systems are often seen by the opposing side as a form of offensive weapon designed to “mop-up” any missiles which would survive a nuclear first-strike.

Thus missile defense systems have tended only to increase the danger and likelihood of nuclear war.  This was the reason that the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty was negotiated between the US and the Soviet Union in 1972 – both nations saw that there was no way to “win” by deploying ABM systems.

Can the population be protected in a nuclear attack?

It is virtually impossible to protect any population from a nuclear attack with even a single nuclear weapon. Once a weapon is detonated, those inside the fire zone will not survive the ensuing firestorm, even if they are in a deep basement or underground shelter. Since the firestorm requires only tens of minutes to develop and create air temperatures well above the boiling point of water, along with hurricane force winds which drive the flames horizontally at ground level, there is virtually no time to escape. Strategic nuclear weapons create firestorms over total areas of hundreds or thousands square kilometers or miles.
Those outside the firestorm and downwind from radioactive fallout would need to be in underground shelters stocked with enough food and water to last for about one to three weeks, since it would take that much time before the radioactivity levels come down to levels low enough to preclude immediate sickness or death.

However, in a large nuclear war, deadly climate change would cause average surface temperatures on Earth to become so cold that it would become impossible to grow food crops for many years. Even those who escaped the initial fire, blast and radioactivity would eventually starve to death.

When Early Warning Systems warn of an impending nuclear attack, then decisions have to be made very quickly because the flight times of the missiles are very short. 30 minutes or less are required for a nuclear-armed land-based Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) to travel between the U.S. and Russia and vice versa; 15 minutes or less for a Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) to reach its target.

Thus, once the attack is detected, evaluated and passed up the chain of command, the U.S. and Russian president would have at most 12 minutes to make the decision to launch a retaliatory nuclear strike before the arrival of the perceived attack.
In the event an attack is believed to be real, the president must decide whether or not to launch a retaliatory nuclear strike before the arrival of the perceived attack is confirmed by nuclear detonations. To launch a retaliatory nuclear strike based only upon electronic information derived from Early Warning Systems is to Launch-on-Warning. If the perceived warning turns out to be false but a retaliatory nuclear strike has already been launched, then accidental nuclear war will have occurred.

PREPARE FOR THE WORST

TOMORROW MAY BEE TOO LATE!!!!!

The US and Russia are the only two nations believed to have the capacity to carry out Launch-on-Warning (they both have nuclear C3I systems connected to their nuclear weapon systems which enable them to carry out LoW).

Accidental Nuclear War Caused by Terrorism

Under Launch-on-Warning policy, a false warning due to human error, technical error or terrorist sabotage can result in accidental nuclear war.

Terrorists could carry out two forms of attacks which could cause a mistaken retaliatory launch using Launch-on-Warning policy. First, terrorists could create the illusion of an impending nuclear attack. They could do so by spoofing radar or satellite sensors of Early Warning Systems to imitate a nuclear attack. This could also be accomplished by introducing computer viruses or software that mimic a full-scale nuclear attack into Early Warning System computers or computers which compromise the nuclear command and control systems.

Rather than create the illusion of an attack, terrorists could also gain access to high-alert nuclear weapons. They could launch these weapons if they obtain launch codes and access to the command and control systems, or physical control of a weapon system.

If the nuclear weapon states would eliminate the policy of Launch-on-Warning, accidental nuclear war based upon a false warning would be prevented .
Is it possible to have a reliable defense against a nuclear attack?

Nuclear weapons can arrive at their targets in all manner of ways. Weapons do not have come via missiles or strategic bombers, they can be smuggled across borders and arrive in a commercial airliner, a ship or truck. A bomb can be exploded in the harbor of a nation before it is even taken ashore. Even the most vicious police state will be hard-pressed to prevent nuclear weapons from entering its territory.

However, since most nuclear weapons in the US and Russia are mounted on some form of missile, the focus for years has been how to defend against a missile attack. Despite decades of research and tens of billions of dollars of expenditures, it has proven virtually impossible to construct a defense system which can reliably detect and shoot down missiles which travel faster than a speeding bullet.

Simple defensive measures, such as employing decoys which resemble warheads, are enough to overwhelm and defeat even the latest versions of missile defense. US missile defense systems also have extremely limited capabilities in terms of the numbers of missiles which they could engage (even if they had 100% assurance of destroying each target, which they do not). A single failure of such a system would likely result in the deaths of millions of people.

Deploying and expanding these systems has historically only added fuel to an arms race which causes the deployment of more opposing missiles and the development of new technologies designed to overcome any defensive measures. Furthermore, missile defense systems are often seen by the opposing side as a form of offensive weapon designed to “mop-up” any missiles which would survive a nuclear first-strike.

Thus missile defense systems have tended only to increase the danger and likelihood of nuclear war. This was the reason that the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty was negotiated between the US and the Soviet Union in 1972 – both nations saw that there was no way to “win” by deploying ABM systems.

The United States for planning to flood with Europe with anti-Russia propaganda—that involves the Americans channeling millions-of-dollars into European local media outlets as long as they report what they are told—contains a terrifyingly cryptic comment made by Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu saying the “now active” Akademik Lomonosov “will shack them back to their senses” and his further stating “no matter how much they prepare”—an obvious reference to last months massive US military drill off the Western Coast of America “preparing for the Big One”—that appears is coming sooner than later after a 6.4 magnitude quake hit Southern California on 4 July, which was followed by a 5-times more powerful 7.1 magnitude quake on 5 July—and brings to mind the late Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez’s warning in 2015 that the “US had already used its earthquake weapon”. 

Most concerning about this report is an exchange between Security Council Members Valentina Matviyenko and Sergei Naryshkin discussing Stanislav Lunev—that’s nearly entirely redacted and classified at the national security rating “Of Special Importance”—but whose grave significance of lies in the fact that Lunev is the highest ranking Russian military intelligence to ever have defected to the United States, and where, since 1992, he’s been in the FBI witness protection programme under their strictest protection protocols—and is due to his having a lawful “kill order” issued against him by Russian intelligence services after he revealed to the Americans the Russia’s most secret war plans and special weapons—and as he described in the following exchange::

Question from B: New kinds of weapons seem to be coming out of Russia, here is a new one on me, maybe a lot of other people, what is a seismic weapon and was/ is the Russian government doing to produce them?

Lunev answer: This is actually artificial earthquake, which could be generated by special devices, which increase natural seismic waves, which are under our (Earth’s) surface and explode like natural earthquake with all following circumstances. Its actually, this weapon development was in place for about more than 20 years and in the mid of 80s there have been several fields tests of this weapons and maybe you heard this Armenian city Spitak was totally destroyed.

Question from B: Good lord, don’t tell me that was a Soviet test?

Lunev answer: It was an accidental explosion.

Question from B: That was an artificially induced earthquake?

Lunev answer: It was accidental explosion of earthquake which was generated by the test of seismic weapons.

Though not mentioned in this report, the “special devices” refered to by traitor Stanislav Lunev are best known in the West as “tectonic weapons”—that function by creating a powerful charge of elastic energy in the form of deformed volume of the Earth’s crust in a region of tectonic activity—that then becomes an earthquake once triggered by a nuclear explosion in the epicenter or a vast electric pulse.

This is a critical point to understand as this report does specifically mention that the Security Council will not respond to the Pentagon’s claim that Russia has been conducting secret nuclear tests—the focus of which centers around the Akademik Lomonosov—the most powerful in the world ever constructed non-self propelled, and massive, secretive nuclear power plant—the final “testing” of occurring on 25 June that caused a 6.2 magnitude quake to strike Kamchatka—but resulted in 5-days later, on 30 June, its being issued a 10-year operating license and being handed over to Rosatom— the highly secretive Russian state corporation headquartered in Moscow that specializes in nuclear energy and special atomic weapons.

Mysterious nuclear Akademik Lomonosov vessel-weapon (above) becomes active and operational on 30 June 2019

As fate would have it though, barely 24-hours after the Akademik Lomonosov became active and operational on 30 June, the Americans launched and unprovoked attack on Russia’s most secretive submarine that was preparing to lift from the deep sea floor in international waters off the coast of Japan a crashed US stealth F-35 fighter that killed 14 Russian sailors—an attack immediately followed by US Air Force Chief of Staff General David Goldfein shockingly detailing his 3-Step plan to wage nuclear war against Russia if it retaliated. 

Within 24-hours of US Air Force General Goldfein threatening Russia with nuclear war, Alaska, on 3 July, was hit by a massive outbreak of 38 earthquakes—a mysterious earthquake event that traveled down the Western Pacific coast of North America striking next between Haida Gwaii and Vancouver Island with a 6.2 magnitude trembler—on 4 July traveled down into Southern California striking it with a 6.4 magnitude quake—and, just hours ago, on 5 July, saw it being struck again with a 5-times more powerful 7.1 magnitude quake.

By applying the scientific problem-solving principle “Occam’s Razor” that states “entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily” to what is now occurring—coincidence (a remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances without apparent causal connection) no longer applies—as the truest explanation of these events shows clearly that Russia is now retaliating against the United States for killing its sailors and threatening nuclear war by employing its long known about earthquake weapon against America—thus leaving only to be asked: “What Horror Is Next To Come?”

Peoples living in this earthquake war zone region of North America (above) should really consider taking an early vacation.

Can the population be protected in a nuclear attack?

It is virtually impossible to protect any population from a nuclear attack with even a single nuclear weapon.  Once a weapon is detonated, those inside the fire zone will not survive the ensuing firestorm, even if they are in a deep basement or underground shelter. Since the firestorm requires only tens of minutes to develop and create air temperatures well above the boiling point of water, along with hurricane force winds which drive the flames horizontally at ground level, there is virtually no time to escape. Strategic nuclear weapons create firestorms over total areas of hundreds or thousands square kilometers or miles.

Those outside the firestorm and downwind from radioactive fallout would need to be in underground shelters stocked with enough food and water to last for about one to three weeks, since it would take that much time before the radioactivity levels come down to levels low enough to preclude immediate sickness or death.

However, in a large nuclear war, deadly climate change would cause average surface temperatures on Earth to become so cold that it would become impossible to grow food crops for many years.  Even those who escaped the initial fire, blast and radioactivity would eventually starve to death.

Do you know about the gift of nature to save the life of people from various health problems and make them feel secure by curing significant issues? How to live healthy in this world without having chronic diseases or illness or any other health issues which may hurt you physically and mentally? Due to dense population, people are trying to demolish the forest, garden areas to create shelter, so they forced to destroy the nature’s gift such as natural ingredients, secret medicinal herbs and more which are grown in wild forest, mountains and other places. When you read this review entirely, sure you will get chance to know about secrets medicinal ingredients, herbs and more used by our ancestor to get back the lost health without losing your life. Claude Davis was highlighted all the stuff in the form of the e-book The Lost Book Of Remedies filled with a list of natural ingredients and remedies that you can quickly grow in the backyard or at free space to include it in your routine diet or external usage to get well soon.

Books can be your best pre-collapse investment.

Carnivore’s Bible (is a wellknown meat processor providing custom meat processing services locally andacross the state of Montana and more. Whether your needs are for domestic meator wild game meat processing)

The Lost Book of Remedies PDF ( contains a series of medicinal andherbal recipes to make home made remedies from medicinal plants and herbs.Chromic diseases and maladies can be overcome  by taking the remediesoutlined in this book. The writer claims that his grandfather was taughtherbalism and healing whilst in active service during world war twoand that he has treated many soldiers with his home made cures. )

Easy Cellar(Info about building and managing your root cellar, plus printable plans. The book on building and using root cellars – The Complete Root Cellar Book.)

The Lost Ways (Learn the long forgotten secrets that helped our forefathers survive famines,wars,economic crisis and anything else life threw at them)

LOST WAYS 2 ( Wordof the day: Prepare! And do it the old fashion way, like our fore-fathers did it and succeed longbefore us,because what lies ahead of us will require all the help we can get. Watch this video and learn the 3 skills that ensured our ancestors survival in hard times offamine and war.)